首页> 外文OA文献 >Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
【2h】

Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

机译:辅助(术后)化疗治疗早期上皮性卵巢癌。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Epithelial ovarian cancer is diagnosed in 4500 women in the UK each year of whom 1700 will ultimately die of their disease.Of all cases 10% to 15% are diagnosed early when there is still a good possibility of cure. The treatment of early stage disease involves surgery to remove disease often followed by chemotherapy. The largest clinical trials of this adjuvant therapy show an overall survival (OS) advantage with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy but the precise role of this treatment in subgroups of women with differing prognoses needs to be defined. To systematically review the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer to determine firstly whether there is a survival advantage of this treatment over the policy of observation following surgery with chemotherapy reserved for treatment of disease recurrence, and secondly to determine if clinical subgroups of differing prognosis based on histological sub-type, or completeness of surgical staging, have more or less to gain from chemotherapy following initial surgery. We performed an electronic search using the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2011, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1948 to Aug week 5, 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to week 36, 2011). We developed the search strategy using free-text and medical subject headings (MESH). We selected randomised clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria set out based on the populations, interventions, comparisons and outcome measures. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third review author. We performed random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses. Five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), enrolling 1277 women, with a median follow-up of 46 to 121 months, met the inclusion criteria. Four trials were included in the meta-analyses and we considered them to be at a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of five-year data from three trials indicated that women who received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy had better overall survival (OS) than those who did not (1008 women; hazard ratio (HR) 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.93). Likewise, meta-analysis of five-year data from four trials indicated that women who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better progression-free survival (PFS) than those who did not (1170 women; HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.84). The trials included in these meta-analyses gave consistent estimates of the effects of chemotherapy. In addition, these findings were robust over time (10-year PFS: two trials, 925 women; HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.84).Subgroup analysis suggested that women who had optimal surgical staging of their disease were unlikely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (HR for OS 1.22; 95% CI 0.63 to 2.37; two trials, 234 women) whereas those who had sub-optimal staging did (HR for OS 0.63; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.85; two trials, 772 women). One trial showed a benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among women at high risk (HR for OS 0.48; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.72) but not among those at low/medium risk (HR for OS 0.95; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.66). However, these subgroup findings could be due to chance and should be interpreted with caution. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in prolonging the survival of the majority of patients who are assessed as having early (FIGO stage I/IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. However, it may be withheld from women in whom there is well-differentiated encapsulated unilateral disease (stage 1a grade 1) or those with comprehensively staged Ib, well or moderately differentiated (grade 1/2) disease. Others with unstaged early disease or those with poorly differentiated tumours should be offered chemotherapy. A pragmatic approach may be necessary in clinical settings where optimal staging is not normally performed/achieved. In such settings, adjuvant chemotherapy may be withheld from those with encapsulated stage Ia grade 1 serous and endometrioid carcinoma and offered to all others with early stage disease.
机译:在英国,每年有4500名女性被诊断出上皮性卵巢癌,其中1700人最终会死于这种疾病。在所有病例中,只有10%到15%的女性被诊断出早期可以治愈的机会。早期疾病的治疗包括外科手术以去除疾病,然后进行化学疗法。这项辅助治疗的最大临床试验显示,基于铂的辅助化疗具有总体生存(OS)优势,但该治疗在预后不同的女性亚组中的确切作用尚需明确。为了系统地回顾早期卵巢上皮癌辅助化疗的证据,首先确定该治疗相对于保留用于疾病复发的化学疗法进行手术后的观察策略是否具有生存优势,其次确定是否存在临床上的辅助治疗根据组织学亚型或手术分期的完整性,不同的预后或多或少可从初始手术后的化疗中获益。我们使用Cochrane妇科癌症专业登记册,Cochrane对照试验中央登记册(2011年中央,第3期),MEDLINE(1948年至2011年8月5日)和EMBASE(1980年至2011年36周)进行了电子搜索。我们使用自由文本和医学主题词(MESH)开发了搜索策略。我们选择了符合人群,干预措施,比较和结局指标确定的纳入标准的随机临床试验。两名评价作者独立提取数据并评估了试验质量。通过与第三位评论作者的讨论解决了分歧。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析和亚组分析。五项随机对照试验(RCT)招募了1277名女性,中位随访时间为46到121个月,符合纳入标准。荟萃分析包括四项试验,我们认为它们的偏倚风险较低。对来自三项试验的五年数据进行的荟萃分析表明,接受辅助化疗的女性比未接受辅助化疗的女性(1008名女性;风险比(HR)为0.71; 95%置信区间(CI)更好)0.53至0.93)。同样,对来自四项试验的五年数据进行的荟萃分析表明,接受辅助化疗的女性比未接受辅助化疗的女性具有更好的无进展生存期(1170名女性; HR 0.67; 95%CI 0.53至0.84)。这些荟萃分析中包括的试验对化学疗法的效果给出了一致的估计。此外,这些发现随着时间的推移是有力的(10年PFS:两项试验,925名女性; HR 0.67; 95%CI 0.54至0.84)。亚组分析表明,对其疾病进行最佳手术分期的女性不太可能从中受益辅助化疗(HR为OS 1.22; 95%CI为0.63至2.37;两项试验,234名女性),而分期次佳的患者则为(HR OS为0.63; 95%CI为0.46至0.85;两项试验,772名女性)。一项试验显示辅助化疗对高危女性(HR的OS为0.48; 95%CI为0.32至0.72)受益,但对中/低风险女性(OS的HR为0.95; 95%CI为0.54至1.66)没有益处。但是,这些亚组的发现可能是偶然的,因此应谨慎解释。基于铂的辅助化疗有效地延长了大多数被评估为患有早期(FIGO I / IIa期)上皮性卵巢癌的患者的生存期。但是,对于患有高度分化的包囊性单侧疾病(1a级1级)或患有Ib全面分期,高分化或中度分化(1/2级)疾病的女性,可以不使用它。其他患有早期疾病或肿瘤分化较差的患者应接受化疗。在正常情况下无法实现最佳分期的临床环境中,务实的方法可能是必要的。在这种情况下,对于包封的1a期1a级浆液性和子宫内膜样癌的患者,可能无法进行辅助化疗,而将其提供给所有其他患有早期疾病的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号